Weekly Points Target: Why to Count the Week, Not the Day

Ivan Bolonikhin

Founder, HiHuman ·

A weekly target is the number of points a child earns over seven days for the week to count as a good one. It exists because a single day can fall apart for a hundred reasons, while a week shows the real picture. We count by the week, and the fights at our house have noticeably dropped.

What is a weekly target in plain words?

It is a bar. You agree in advance: for the week to count as done, the child needs to earn this many points. How he earns them is up to him: more morning jobs, more cleaning, more help.

What matters is that the target is written down and does not change in the middle of the week. The child sees how much he has earned and how much is left, and decides for himself what to do on Thursday evening.

Why is a week better than a day?

Because a daily count turns every setback into a tragedy. A headache, a test at school, guests arriving, and the day is lost. The child feels he lost, and he stops caring.

A week works differently. A bad Monday can be made up on Tuesday and Saturday. The child learns to manage his time and energy: if today is hard, I will catch up tomorrow. That is a very grown-up skill, and it is built exactly over distances like this.

How do I pick the size of the target?

My rule: the target should be reachable in an ordinary week without heroics, but not reachable without effort. If the child hits it by Wednesday, it is too small. If he never hits it, it is too big.

Start with a reference point. Take the list of jobs you really want to see in a week and add up their prices. Set the target at about three quarters of that sum. The rest is a cushion for illness, guests and bad days.

As an example, not a recommendation: if all the jobs in a week add up to 60 points, the target could be around 45. Your numbers will be different. After two weeks, look at the result and adjust.

What if the target is reached too early?

That is a good problem, but it has a catch. If everything is earned by Wednesday, the child stops doing anything until Sunday. So I keep the basic daily jobs mandatory regardless of points: walking the dog in the morning does not get canceled just because the target is already met.

Above the target you can offer bonuses: extra tasks at a higher price, a special reward for going beyond. But do not overdo it. The goal of the week is stability, not a record.

What happens if the target is missed?

This has to be known in advance. In our house the child then gets one big task, a large piece of work instead of the usual punishments. After it, the week counts as closed, and you start over. I wrote about how this works in a separate article.

If the week fails two or three times in a row, do not turn up the pressure. Revisit the target and the jobs. Most likely something in the setup is off: too much, too soon or too unclear. Sometimes the cause is how the child feels or what is going on in his life, and then it is better to talk with him calmly.

How do I explain the target so it does not feel like a work quota?

Talk not about points but about meaning. We live together, everyone has a share of the housework, and a week is a convenient stretch to see how we did. The target is not a grade for a person, it is a guide to how much work the house needs to be in good shape.

I show the target with an example. Here is the list of jobs, here is what you can choose, here is how much you need. The child decides where to start, and that removes the feeling of being pushed. A choice inside a frame works better than an order.

Say out loud that the target will not grow without a conversation, or the child will start holding back.

Should kids of different ages have different targets?

Yes, and not only because of age. A younger child suits simple jobs and a small bar, an older one gets more independence and more responsibility. But workload matters more than age: a child with a heavy school week should have a lower target than in a calm period.

I do not recommend comparing kids by points. Each child competes with his own bar, not with a brother or sister.

What about illness, vacations and trips?

Counting those weeks by the usual rules is unfair. When a child is sick, the target does not apply at all, and we simply do not keep score. On vacations and trips you can temporarily change the set of jobs and lower the target ahead of time, not after the fact.

The key is that exceptions are announced before the week begins. Then they are part of the rules, not a concession. If exceptions are invented along the way, the child learns to bargain for them, and the system loses weight.

Should I change the target during the month?

I do not change it in the middle of a week, but once a month I review it together with my child. We look at the last few weeks: if the target was met without effort, we raise it a little. If it was not met, we lower it or take out some jobs. This is ordinary tuning, not an admission of defeat.

If week after week goes smoothly, that is the best sign the target is right.

How do we wrap up the week?

We do it Sunday evening, briefly. We count the points, look at the target, talk about what worked and what did not. Then rewards: if the target is met, the child picks his own.

I ask what was hard, what helped and what to change next week. Sometimes his ideas are better than mine.

In HiHuman the weekly target and the count run automatically, but the same logic works on a sheet of paper. The tool is not what matters, regularity and a calm tone are.

Want to run this as a game instead of in your head?

HiHuman has tasks priced in points, a weekly target, rewards, rules and a ranking. The parent stays in charge, and the child sees clear rules.

Try HiHuman